Corporate Governance conclusion

Back   Next

Appointments and re-elections to the Board
The Chairman and the other non-executive directors are appointed for an initial period of three years which, with the approval of the Nominations Committee and the Board, would normally be extended for a further three years. In exceptional circumstances, appointments of non-executive directors may be extended beyond six years, with the approval of the Nominations Committee, the Board and the individual director concerned, if it is in the interests of the Group to do so.

Under the Company’s Articles of Association, each director is required to be re-elected at the third Annual General Meeting following that at which he or she was last elected or re-elected. John Potter and Gareth Rhys Williams will retire and will be proposed for re-election at the 2005 Annual General Meeting. Two new non-executive directors were appointed during the year, Nigel Moore, on 1 March 2004 and Michael Harper on 14 June 2004. Mr Moore was appointed as a member of the Audit Committee and he took over the chairmanship of that Committee on 31 August 2004. Mr Harper took over as Chairman when Alison Carnwath stepped down at the end of October 2004. Mr Moore’s appointment was approved by shareholders at the 2004 Annual General Meeting. Mr Harper will be proposed for election at the 2005 Annual General Meeting.

Mr Potter has now completed six years service as a nonexecutive director. He has significant business experience and detailed knowledge of the Group and has been asked, and has agreed, to continue in his current role for a further period. At the appropriate time, the Nominations Committee will undertake a search for his successor.

Relations with Shareholders
The Board recognises the importance of maintaining regular contact with its shareholders to ensure that its businesses, strategy and remuneration policies are understood and that any concerns are addressed in a constructive way. The Board communicates with its shareholders through a combination of public announcements through the Stock Exchange, analyst briefings and press interviews at the time of the announcements of the interim and the full year results and, when appropriate, at other times in the year. The executive directors and the Chairman also meet with investors from time to time during the year. The annual general meeting offers a further opportunity for the directors to meet with shareholders.

At meetings of shareholders, the level of proxy votes received, together with the numbers of votes in favour, against and withheld, is announced after each resolution has been dealt with on a show of hands. Separate resolutions are proposed for each issue upon which shareholders are asked to vote. The Group’s website is being expanded to contain details of the resolutions and the voting thereon.

The Company has complied with the requirement set out in the Code in respect of shareholders’ meetings to send the notice of annual general meeting and related papers at least 20 working days before the meeting. It will continue to comply with the requirement.

Internal control and risk management
The Board is responsible for the Group’s system of internal control to safeguard shareholders’ investment and the Company’s assets. As part of its responsibility, the Board regularly, and at least annually, reviews the effectiveness of its internal controls. The Group has systems and procedures for internal control that are designed to provide reasonable control over the activities of the Group and to enable the Board to fulfil its legal responsibility for the keeping of proper accounting records, safeguarding the assets of the Group and detecting fraud and other irregularities. However, it is recognised that it is in the nature of any business that business and commercial risks must be taken and that for a business to succeed, enterprise, initiative and the motivation of employees are key elements that must not be unduly stifled. It is not the intention of the Group to avoid all commercial risks and commercial judgements will have to be made in the course of the management of the business.

The Board has adopted a risk-based approach to establishing the system of internal control. The application, and the process, followed by the Board in reviewing the effectiveness of the system of internal control during the year are as follows:

  • operating company management is charged with the ongoing responsibility for identifying risks facing each of the businesses and for putting in place procedures to monitor and manage risks.
  • the responsibilities of the chief executive officer and chief financial officer at each operating unit to manage risks within their businesses are periodically reinforced by Group executive management.
  • major commercial, technological and financial risks to the Group are formally assessed during the annual long-term business planning process around mid-year. These plans and the attendant risks to the Group are reviewed and considered by the Board.
  • large capital projects, product development projects and acquisitions and disposals require Board approval.
  • the process by which the Board reviews the effectiveness of internal control has been agreed by the Board and documented. This involves regular reviews by the Board, of the major business risks of the Group together with the controls in place to manage those risks as reported to the Board by the chief executives of each division. In addition, each year businesses formally review, in detail, all of their business risks and their internal controls, including finance, cash, IT, sales, purchasing and logistics. They then prepare statements that describe the extent of their compliance with control objectives. These statements are approved by the chief executive officer and chief financial officer of each operating unit and submitted to Group executive management for review. Any significant matters arising from this review are formally reported to the Board by the Finance Director. The risk and control identification and certification process is monitored and periodically reviewed by Group financial management.
  • A centralised database of risks facing the Group, as well as each individual business, and an evaluation of the impact and likelihood of those risks is maintained and updated regularly.
  • The Board has established a control framework within which the Group operates. This contains the following key elements:
    • organisational structure with clearly defined lines of responsibility, delegation of authority and reporting requirements.
    • defined expenditure authorisation levels.
    • on-site and telephone conferencing operations reviews covering all aspects of each business are conducted by Group executive management on a regular basis throughout the year.
    • comprehensive system of financial reporting. The annual budget and long term plan of each operating company are reviewed in detail and approved by the executive directors. The Board approves the overall Group’s budget and plans. Monthly actual results are reported against prior year and monthly budgets. Forecasts are revised where necessary but formally at least once every quarter. Any significant changes and adverse variances are questioned by the Group executive directors and remedial action is taken where appropriate. Group tax and treasury is co-ordinated centrally. There is weekly cash and treasury reporting to Group financial management and periodic reporting to the Board on the Group’s tax and treasury position.

The Board considers that it has fully complied with the Code during the year and up to the date of approval of the annual report and accounts and that it accords with Turnbull guidance.

The Group does not have an internal audit function. However, the need for such a function is regularly reviewed. The current conclusion of the Board is that an internal audit function is not required given the scale, diversity and complexity of the Group’s activities. Where required, third party audit consultants, independent from the companies’ external auditors, are used on specific assignments. The Company believes it can access professional internal audit support in the relevant country more effectively than by having an internal department. Three such outsourced audits took place in 2004.

Going concern
The directors have made appropriate enquiries and consider that the Group has adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future. Accordingly, the directors continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the accounts.

Statement of directors’ responsibilities
Company law requires the directors to prepare financial statements for each financial year which give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Company and of the Group and of the profit or loss for that period. In preparing those financial statements, the directors are required to:

  • select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently;
  • make judgements and estimates that are reasonable and prudent;
  • state whether applicable accounting standards have been followed, subject to any material departures disclosed and explained in the financial statements; and
  • prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the company and the Group will continue in business.

The directors are responsible for keeping proper accounting records which disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the company and to enable them to ensure that the financial statements comply with the Companies Act 1985. They have general responsibility for taking such steps as are reasonably open to them to safeguard the assets of the Group and to prevent and detect fraud and other irregularities.

Back   Next

Information correct at 13/04/05